Kommentare zu: Sweden 2007, Part 7/7: Stockholm.py II http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/ … as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:09:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 Von: shlomme http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-19 shlomme Mon, 21 May 2007 13:11:01 +0000 http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/#comment-19 1) I've never said that I did not already know, but that wasn't the point of my question in class. 2) Well, did you hear me complain? 1) I’ve never said that I did not already know, but that wasn’t the point of my question in class.

2) Well, did you hear me complain?

]]> Von: eyewitness http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18 eyewitness Mon, 21 May 2007 12:25:18 +0000 http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/#comment-18 1) The question was "did anyone start with 2.2", and that should be obvious given 2.1 was solved and the lab wasn't over. 2) You could have confessed your "slight suspicion" and asked about your students' German knowledge. Would have simplified a lot. And robbed you of a lot of fun. 1) The question was “did anyone start with 2.2″, and that should be obvious given 2.1 was solved and the lab wasn’t over.
2) You could have confessed your “slight suspicion” and asked about your students’ German knowledge. Would have simplified a lot. And robbed you of a lot of fun.

]]> Von: shlomme http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-17 shlomme Mon, 21 May 2007 11:27:33 +0000 http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/#comment-17 1) No, I was asking for exercise 2.2, not the already-being-mocked-about exercise 2.1. 2) You could have confessed your German knowledge to us in the very beginning, then there would never have been the slightest suspicion from our side. 1) No, I was asking for exercise 2.2, not the already-being-mocked-about exercise 2.1.

2) You could have confessed your German knowledge to us in the very beginning, then there would never have been the slightest suspicion from our side.

]]> Von: eyewitness http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-16 eyewitness Mon, 21 May 2007 11:00:34 +0000 http://shlomme.diotavelli.net/2007/05/20/sweden-2007-part-77-stockholmpy-ii/#comment-16 I hate to ruin a good story. Hm, actually... I don’t. Hence a few unwanted corrections. 1) The already solved exercise had been discussed and mocked about the previous day. The psychic power referred to would thus be “memory”. 2) How could one help but overhearing the frolicking going on in front of the first row? Cute, I admit, nevertheless, calling it eavesdropping would – of course – be a blatant lie. I hate to ruin a good story. Hm, actually… I don’t. Hence a few unwanted corrections. 1) The already solved exercise had been discussed and mocked about the previous day. The psychic power referred to would thus be “memory”. 2) How could one help but overhearing the frolicking going on in front of the first row? Cute, I admit, nevertheless, calling it eavesdropping would – of course – be a blatant lie.

]]>